Allowed

Sabita Rohidas v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC25 Jan 2022BLAPL/11188/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A bail application was heard by coram B. P. Routray under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. concerning offences under IPC. The informant had no objection to bail. The court directed release on bail subject to conditions fixed by the learned S.D.J.M. and disposed of the application.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to release petitioners on bail subject to terms and conditions to be fixed by the learned S.D.J.M., Sundargarh.

Sabita Rohidas Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No.11188 of 2021

¶3

Sabita Rohidas and others …. Petitioners Mr. P.K. Samantaray, Advocate

¶4

-versus-

¶5

State of Odisha and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. M.K. Mohanty, A.S.C. Mr. Ajit Rout, Advocate for the informant

¶6

JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

25.01.2022

Order No.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing.

¶12

This is an application under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for bail and the offences alleged are under Secs.147/148/323/354/379/436/149, I.P.C.

¶13

Heard Mr. P.K. Samantaray, learned counsel for the Petitioners, Mr. M.K. Mohanty, learned A.S.C. for the StateOpposite Party as well as Mr. Ajit Rout, learned counsel for the informant.

¶14

It is submitted that the Petitioners are inside custody since 9.12.2021 and in the meantime investigation has progressed to substantial extent. It is also submitted that the Petitioners have been falsely implicated due to civil dispute.

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

It is submitted by Mr. Ajit Rout, learned counsel for the informant that the informant has no objection if the Petitioners are released on bail.

¶17

Upon hearing all the parties and considering the nature of allegations as well as the period of detention of the Petitioners inside custody, it is directed to release the Petitioners on bail in connection with Sundargarh Town P.S. Case No.252/2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No.1440/2021 on such terms and conditions to be fixed by the learned S.D.J.M., Sundargarh as he deems just and proper.

¶18

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶19

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021 and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo No.514, dated 7^th January, 2022.

¶20

( B.P. Routray)

¶21

Judge

¶22

B.K. Barik

¶23

Page 2 of 2

Sabita Rohidas v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabita Rohidas v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Riaz Khan Vs State of Odisha

Bipin Sabar Vs State of Odisha

Bhaskar Sabar Vs State of Odisha

Samim@Samim Begum Vs State of Odisha

Suman Kerketta Vs State of Odisha

Kamala Kumar Nayak@ Kamal Kumar Nayak Vs State of Odisha