Allowed

Sumanta Naik v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC10 Nov 2022BLAPL/10123/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 395/412 IPC, directing his release on police sureties with conditions to appear before the police station weekly until trial concludes.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the Court in seisin, appearing before jurisdictional police station once every week till conclusion of trial.

Sumanta Naik Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No. 10123 of 2022

¶3

Sumanta Naik

¶4

Petitioner

¶5

Mr. S.K. Dash, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha

¶8

…. Opposite Party

¶9

Mr. G.R. Mohapatra, ASC

¶10

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

10.11.2022

Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶17

The petitioner is an accused in connection with G.R. Case No.204 of 2022, pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M., Hindol, arising out of Rasol P.S. Case No.80 of 2022, for alleged commission of offences under Sections 395/412 of IPC.

¶18

Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Hindol, by order dated 29.09.2022 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

¶19

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner though FIR was filed under various Sections of IPC including Section 395 of IPC and Section 3 of Public Property (Prevention of Damage) Act, 1985, after investigation charge-sheet has been filed under Sections 395/412 of IPC.

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

It is stated that the petitioner is in custody since 06.04.2022 and charge-sheet having been filed on 02.08.2022 and the release of the co-accused by this Court by order dated 13.10.2022 in BLAPL No.8659 of 2022, further continuance of the petitioner in custody is not warranted.

¶22

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail inter alia on the ground that the petitioner has number of criminal antecedents.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction submits that the cases in which the petitioner involved are all under Section 379 of IPC and in all the cases he has since been released on bail and it is further submitted with vehemence that in the case at hand because of his criminal proclivity, he has been arrayed as an

¶24

accused.

¶25

Considering the release of the co-accused and filing of charge-sheet, this Court directs the petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin over the matter.

¶26

Considering the criminal proclivity of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional police station once every week till conclusion of trial. The date and time of appearance to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin over the matter.

¶27

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

¶28

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule.

¶29

Ayesha

¶30

Page 2 of 2

Sumanta Naik v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumanta Naik v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju @ Gora @ Rajendra Sethi Vs State of Odisha

Ravi Dangi Vs State of Odisha

Bishu @ Sangram Keshari Behera Vs State of Odisha

Dhiraj Kumar Turuk @ Sinku Vs State of Odisha

Nilu Palei @ Mitu Vs State of Odisha

Bimbadhar Mandal Vs State of Odisha