The High Court rejected the bail application, observing that the lower court had rejected bail before the charge-sheet was filed, rendering this interim consideration inconclusive. Petitioners were directed to approach the seisin court afresh.
BLAPL disposed; Petitioners directed to move the learned Court in seisin afresh for consideration on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 10022 of 2022
Ravi & Another
…. Petitioners
Mr. A.K. Mohanty, Advocate -versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party
Mr. K.K. Gaya, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
31.10.2022
Order No.
01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
Page 1 of 2
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Ayesha
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a bail application considering pre-charge-sheet rejection can be entertained after charge-sheet filing.
Whether the High Court should entertain bail when the lower court had already considered it before the charge-sheet was filed.
How to dispose of a bail application filed after the filing of the charge-sheet wherein bail was previously rejected pre-charge-sheet.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravi & Another
State of Orissa
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
