M/S. Swastik Filling Station v. M/S. Reliance Industries Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ARBP No.60…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARBP No.60 of 2021
M/s. Swastik Filling Station, Jeypore …. Petitioner
Mr. P. K. Rath, Advocate
-versus- M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., …. Opposite Parties Bhubaneswar and another
Mr. Milan Kanungo, Senior Advocate for Opp. Party No.1
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Order No.
Order No. ORDER 18.02.2022 04. 1. In view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Brahmani River Pellets Limited v. Kamachi Industries Limited (2020) 5 SCC 462, Mr. P. K. Rath, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the appropriate Court. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
M. Panda
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Brahmani River Pellets Limited v. Kamachi Industries Limited (2020) 5 SCC 462Referred¶1
M/s. Swastik Filling Station, Jeypore
M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court