The High Court of Odisha dismissed an application for anticipatory bail filed by Fakir @ Rabindra Pradhan. Finding the nature of the criminal charges serious enough, the court held the petitioner not to be a fit case for anticipatory bail.
Application under Section 438 Cr PC dismissed; petitioner denied anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL NO.8441 OF 2022
Fakir @ Rabindra Pradhan
…. Petitioner Mr.S.K. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party.
Ms. Samapika Mishra, ASC.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER
Order No.
16.08.2022
the nature of accusations as those emanate from the materials on record; further keeping in view the other surrounding circumstances; I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(D. Dash), Judge.
Narayan
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC given the nature of accusations.
Whether the allegations in the FIR warrant release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Fakir @ Rabindra Pradhan
State of Odisha
D. DASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
