Allowed

Dinesh Rout v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC3 Feb 2022ABLAPL/732/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioners in an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding alleged offences under Sections 294, 323, 506, and 34 IPC arising from a civil dispute triable by the Magistrate First Class. The Court directed grant of bail on personal bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to be released on bail on bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties and conditions.

Dinesh Rout Vs State of Odisha — Cheque Dishonour | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

ABLAPL No. 732 of 2022

¶3

1. Dinesh Rout

¶4

2. Ashok Kumar Samal 3. Himanshu Samal

¶5

…. Petitioners

¶6

Mr.B.K. Bal, Advocate

¶7

-versus-

¶8

State of Odisha …. Opp. Party
Miss Samapika Mishra,
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
03.02.2022
01. This matter is taken up through Video
Conferencing Mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned counsel for the State.

¶9

This is an application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Jagatpur P.S. Case No.18 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 75 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C. (R), Cuttack for alleged commission of offences under sections 294/323/506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

// 2 //

¶11

Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory bail application.

¶12

Considering submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner no.1 is the son of the informant and petitioner no.2 is the cousin of petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.3 is the son of petitioner no.2 and there was civil dispute between the parties and that the offences are triable by Magistrate, the only non-bailable offence is under section 506 of the Indian Penal Code and after hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing any facts to the Courts or to the investigating Officer. Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

¶13

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶14

Page 2 of 3

¶15

// 3 //

¶16

Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide Office Order dated 7^th January 2022.

( S.K. Sahoo)

Judge

Page 3 of 3

Dinesh Rout v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Rout v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balaram Panda Vs State of Odisha

Trilochan Dandasena Vs State of Odisha

Tutu Nayak@ Susanta Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Pravat Akhua Vs State of Odisha

Sushanta Kumar Majhi Vs State of Odisha

Sanatana Behera Vs State of Odisha