The High Court of Orissa disposed of a bail application from Ratana @ Ratnakar Nayak as infructuous after the learned counsel for the State argued that Section 41-A Cr.P.C. was complied with.
Bail application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 5612 of 2022
Ratana @ Ratnakar Nayak and …. Petitioners another
Mr. B.B. Routray, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr. A.N. Das, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
13.06.2022
( A.K. Mohapatra ) Vacation Judge
U.K. Sahoo
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. should be allowed or disposed of as infructuous.
Ratana @ Ratnakar Nayak
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
U.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
