The Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. For Petitioner 1, the application was dismissed as not pressed. For Petitioner 2, a direction was issued to appear within three weeks for bail grant upon surrender.
Petitioner 1: application disposed as not pressed. Petitioner 2: directed to appear within three weeks for bail grant on surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 4583 OF 2022
Suraj Bagh @ Bagha & another
……… Petitioners
Mr. A.Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
...……… Opposite Party Mr.D.Mund, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
20.05.2022
Order No.
5 Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application in respect Petitioner No.1- Suraj Bagh @ Bagha is disposed of as not pressed.
Page 1 of 2
2
Dhal
( V.Narasingh )
Judge
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant pre-arrest bail or anticipate bail for the petitioners.
Whether the anticipatory bail application of Petitioner No.1 should be adjudicated given it was not pressed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suraj Bagh @ Bagha
Bikash Suna
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
