This judgment dismisses an application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with a case involving IPC offences. The single bench found no prima facie case warranting entertainership.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.3948 OF 2022
Matrujyoti Prasad Prusty
…. Petitioner Mr.S.P. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr.D.R. Parida, ASC.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER
Order No.
18.05.2022
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(D. Dash), Judge.
Narayan
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case involving offences under Sections 493, 420, 506, and 313 IPC.
Matrujyoti Prasad Prusty
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
