Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under CrPC 438 in a theft case. The court declined the application but observed it may be granted regular bail later if co-accused are similarly treated, permitting appeal if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.3401 OF 2022
Silu @ Bikash Behera
…. Petitioner Mr.A.K. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party. Mr.S.K. Nayak, AGA.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER
Order No.
16.05.2022
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
aforesaid case for consideration of the matter of grant of regular bail to the Petitioner; the same shall be considered on its own merit; further taking into account the factum of release of coaccused person(s) on bail, if similarly situated with the Petitioner on the ground parity as per law and disposed of early in accordance with law so as to enable the Petitioner to approach the next higher forum early in case necessity so arises. The case record be made available at the cost of the Petitioner.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Narayan
(D. Dash),
Judge.
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with IPC Section 379.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be granted regular bail in similar circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Silu @ Bikash Behera
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
