High Court of Orissa rejected the petitioner's petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. finding no changing circumstances following an earlier rejection. The court conditionally noted that if the petitioner surrenders within a week, the earlier observation will hold.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.2591 of 2022
Dillip Baral …. Petitioner
Mr.Gyanendra Kumar Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER Order No. 12.05.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
H
prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. It is, however, observed that in the event the Petitioner surrenders within a week hence in connection with the aforesaid case and moves for his release on bail, the observation made in the earlier order dated 03.09.2021 shall hold the field.
(D. Dash)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there are changing circumstances to reconsider the earlier order rejecting the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dillip Baral
State of Odisha
D.Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
