This order briefly notes that the notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. was served on the petitioner and compliance rendered arrest apprehended, leading to disposal of the writ petition on preliminary arguments. No substantive discussion or ratio is provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.16761 of 2021
Laxmidhar Muduli
…. Petitioner
Mr. N. Sahani, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opp. Party
Smt. Susamarani Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
Order No.
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 27.01.2022
This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that the notice contemplated under section 41A of Cr.P.C. has been served on the petitioner and he has complied with the terms and conditions of the notice and therefore, there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the case.
In view of submission made by the learned counsel for the State, the ABLAPL is disposed of.
Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide Office Order dated 7th January 2022.
( S.K. Sahoo)
Judge
RKM
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Laxmidhar Muduli
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
