This is a brief order disposing of a writ petition via video conference. The court accepted the State's submission that the petitioner complied with a summons issued under Section 41A Cr.P.C., removing any apprehension of arrest, and consequently disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.16236 of 2021
Golap Rout ….
Petitioner
Mr. A.R. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opp. Party
Mr. J.P. Patra, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
Order No.
ORDER 20.01.2022
This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the State on instruction submitted that the notice contemplated under section 41A of Cr.P.C. has been issued to the petitioner and she has complied with the terms and conditions of the notice and therefore, there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the case.
In view of such submission made by the learned counsel for the State, the ABLAPL is disposed of.
Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner
// 2 //
prescribed vide Office Order dated 7th January 2022.
( S.K. Sahoo)
Judge
RKM
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the ABLAPL given that the petitioner complied with the summons under Section 41A Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Golap Rout
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
