Allowed

Karuan Gadtya v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC1 Feb 2022ABLAPL/16177/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 341 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The order imposes conditions including bail bond payment, appearance for interrogation, and non-inducement of witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, non-inducement of witnesses, and appearance for interrogation.

Karuan Gadtya Vs State of Odisha — Anticipatory Bail | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

ABLAPL No.16177 of 2021

¶3

Karuan Gadtya

¶4

…. Petitioner

¶5

Mr. J. Sahu, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha …. Opp. Party

¶8

Smt. Susamarani Sahoo Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

Order No.

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 01.02.2022 This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶14

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with G.R. Case No.349 of 2021 arising out of Loisingha P.S. Case No.365 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Loisingha for alleged commission of offences under sections 341/307 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Perused the F.I.R.

¶16

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to previous dispute between the parties, the case has been foisted and there are no such materials against the petitioner so as to attract the ingredients of the offence under section 307 of

¶17

the Indian Penal Code and on hearing the learned counsel for the State, who submitted that the injured Akash Sa has sustained simple injury, I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that he shall make himself available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing any facts to the Courts or to the Investigating Officer.

¶18

Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

¶19

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide office order dated 7^th January 2022.

( S.K. Sahoo)

RKM

Page 2 of 2

Karuan Gadtya v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karuan Gadtya v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuni Mallick Vs State of Odisha

Purusottam Bhutia@ Topa Vs State of Odisha

Sebati Samal Vs State of Odisha

Satyabrata Das Vs State of Odisha

Akshaya Prusty@ Bapun@ Sahadev Prusty Vs State of Odisha

Bhagyarathi Sethi Vs State of Odisha