Allowed

Musri Huika@ Huika Musri v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC18 Jan 2022ABLAPL/16048/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Oriassa at Cuttack granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to appear for interrogation and not tamper with evidence.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on anticipatory bail upon arrest, subject to furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and complying with specific conditions regarding interroga

Musri Huika@ Huika Musri Vs State of Odisha — Anticipatory Bail | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

ABLAPL No.16048 of 2021

¶3

Musri Huika @ Huika …. Petitioner Musri

¶4

Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha

¶7

…. Opp. Party

¶8

Mr. D.K. Pani, Addl. Standing Counsel

¶9

Order No.

¶10

¶11

CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 18.01.2022

¶12

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with G.R. Case No.111 of 2004 arising out of Narayanpatna P.S. Case No.43 of 2004 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Laxmipur for alleged commission of offences under sections 341/324/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Perused the F.I.R.

¶15

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the offences are triable by Magistrate and the only non-bailable offence is under section 506 of the Indian Penal Code and further taking

¶16

// 2 //

¶17

into account the delay in lodging the first information report and on hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that he shall make himself available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Investigating Officer.

¶18

Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

¶19

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide Office Order dated 7^th January 2022.

( S.K. Sahoo)

Judge

RKM

Page 2 of 2

Musri Huika@ Huika Musri v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Musri Huika@ Huika Musri v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mitu Ranjan Rout Vs State of Odisha

Rajkishor Naik Vs State of Odisha

Nirmala Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Ranjit Rout@ Chagala Vs State of Odisha

Md.Nizam Vs State of Odisha

Prasanna Kumar Sahoo Vs State of Odisha