Allowed

Mohammad Umar Farooq@Sk. Umar v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC11 Jan 2022ABLAPL/15544/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 294, 327, 307, and 34, noting the injury sustained was simple and no material existed to attract section 307 IPC.

What did the court decide?

Directs petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties for the same amount under standard conditions.

Mohammad Umar Farooq@Sk. Umar Vs State of Odisha — Anticipatory Bail | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

ABLAPL No.15544 of 2021

¶3

Mohammad Umar Farooq …. Petitioner @ Sk. Kumar

¶4

Mr. S. Mahanty, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha …. Opp. Party

¶7

Mr. J.P. Patra, Addl. Standing Counsel

¶8

Order No.

¶9

¶10

CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 11.01.2022 This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing Mode. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶11

This is an application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Jagatsinghpur P.S. Case No.619 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1342 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Jagatsinghpur for alleged commission of offences under sections 341/294/327/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Learned counsel for the State on instruction as per the order dated 04.01.2022 submitted that one Sk. Asiruddin @ Talib has sustained simple injury.

¶13

Considering the submissions made by the learned

¶14

// 2 //

¶15

counsel for the respective parties, the nature of accusation against the petitioner and there are no such material to attract the ingredients of the offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and that the injury sustained by the injured is simple in nature, I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that he shall make himself available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing any facts to the Courts or to the investigating Officer. Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

¶16

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶17

Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide Office Order dated 7^th January 2022.

( S.K. Sahoo)

Judge

Page 2 of 2

Mohammad Umar Farooq@Sk. Umar v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Umar Farooq@Sk. Umar v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Minaketan Kheti Vs State of Odisha

Khageswar Patra Vs State of Odisha

Mita Kumari Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Pathani Mohapatra Vs State of Odisha

Rakesh Ranjan Padhi Vs State of Odisha

Ashish Padhan Vs State of Odisha