The learned Counsel for the Petitioner did not press the application during the hearing. Consequently, the application was dismissed as not pressed, and the interim order passed earlier ceased to subsist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.15521 OF 2020
Mamata Naik
…. Petitioner Mr.S. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party. Mr.G.N. Rout, ASC.
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER 22.04.2022
Order No.
(D. Dash), Judge.
Narayan
Page 1 of 1
Mamata Naik
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
