In a three-line order dated 09.12.2021, the High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition for default/contumacy as the petitioner failed to appear with counsel on the adjourned date.
Writ petition dismissed for default/non-appearance of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OAC) No.49 of 2001 (Through hybrid mode)
Prasanna Kumar Parida
…. Petitioner
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Party
Mr. R.N.Acharya, Advocate for O.P.2
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
09.12.2021
Order No.
02. 1. None appears on behalf of petitioner.
2. On 2 nd December, 2021, following order was made :-
“ 1. None appears on behalf of petitioner.
2. Mr. Acharya, learned advocate appears on behalf of
School and Mass Education Department.
3. List on 9 th December, 2021.
4. It is made clear, if petitioner continues to go
unrepresented on adjourned date or thereafter, the writ
petition is likely to be dismissed.”
3. The writ petition is dismissed.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
Prasant
Page 1 of 1
Prasanna Kumar Parida
State of Odisha
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
