Laxmidhar Bhol v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa disposed of a between-year-old writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time, without addressing any substantive legal contentions.
The High Court of Orissa disposed of a between-year-old writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time, without addressing any substantive legal contentions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No. 2839 of 1999
Laxmidhar Bhol
…. Petitioner
Mr. S. Sahoo, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER_ 28.09.2021
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Order No. 01
01
2. Since this is an year old matter, by efflux of time, this writ
petition has become infructuous.
3. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
( Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 1 of 1
Laxmidhar Bhol
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
A.K. Rana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court