, the High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition without expressing an opinion on merits, directing the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation regarding service regularization within three months.
Direction to opposite party no.3 to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 2293 of 2004
Narayan Behera
….
Petitioner
Mr. K.P. Mishra, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and others ….
Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
15.12.2021
Order No.
01
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Arun
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to direction to regularize services as a regular coach.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narayan Behera
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
