High Court disposed of an old writ petition (1989) after counsel stated no instructions were available, granting liberty to approach concerned authorities if cause of action survives.
Writ petition disposed with liberty to approach concerned authority if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 771 of 1989
L. Maheswar Rao
…. Petitioner Mr. J.N. Jena, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No.
01
ORDER 24.09.2021 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions, however since it is an old case of the year 1989, therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned if any cause of action still survives.
With the liberty aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Arun
Page 1 of 1
L. Maheswar Rao
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
