The writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the concerned authority. The Court expressly stated it had not expressed any view on the matter.
leave withdrawn; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.9110 of 2020
Ranjit Kumar Panigrahi …. Petitioner Mr. A. Pattnaik, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A. K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER 21.12.2021 Order No. 02. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the concerned authority in accordance with law. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. The Court clarifies that it has not expressed any view in the matter.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (A. K. Mohapatra) Judge
M. Panda
Ranjit Kumar Panigrahi
State of Odisha
A. K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
