The Writ Petition was dismissed for no instruction as the learned counsel had no instruction and did not appear for the Petitioner on the day of the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC NO.9097 OF 2009
Dr.Subhranshu Sekhar Mohapatra
…. Petitioner
Mr.D.R.Bhokta, Advocate
-versus-
Development Commissioner-cum- …. Opposite Parties Additional Chief Secretary to Government & Ors.
None
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
25.10.2021
Order No.
06. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has no
instruction in the matter.
2. In the circumstance, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for
no instruction.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
M.K.Rout
Page 1 of 1
Dr.Subhranshu Sekhar Mohapatra
Development Commissioner-cum-Additional Chief Secretary to Government
Biswanath Rath
M.K.Rout
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
