In a writ petition regarding land acquisition compensation, the petitioners withdrew further claims after the respondent stated the awarded amount could be received upon identification, leading to the disposal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8958 of 2012
Dhaneswar Naik and others …. Petitioners Mr. Pratik Dash, Advocate on behalf of M/s. A. A. Das, Advocate
-versus-
…. Land Acquisition Officer, Sundargarh Opposite Parties and others
Mr. S. N. Das, ASC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A. K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER 14.12.2021
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(A. K. Mohapatra)
Judge
M. Panda
Dhaneswar Naik and others
Land Acquisition Officer, Sundargarh
A. K. Mohapatra
S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
