The Court noted the delay in implementing an award dated 15 October 2008 beyond the statutory limitation period. Consequently, it declined to entertain the writ petition and disposed of the matter.
Dismissed the writ petition without entertaining it due to non-implementation of the award beyond the limitation period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.7821 of 2009
M/s. Mayurbhanj Medical Academy
…. Petitioner
Mr. Budhadev Routray, Sr. Advocate
-versus-
Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Bhubaneswar and another
…. Opp. Parties
Mr. Kalyan Patnaik, Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
Order No.
ORDER 8.9.2021
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
M.K. Panda
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained despite non-implementation of the impugned award beyond the statutory limitation period.
M/s. Mayurbhanj Medical Academy
Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Bhubaneswar
another
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
