The High Court allowed a writ petition challenging a directive to produce bank guarantees in lieu of solvency certificates for excise license renewal, as it was covered by a common judgment in Gopinath Sahu v. State of Odisha.
Directed the State Government to renew the license upon production of the solvency certificate, subject to other conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.7466 of 2021 1
2
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(B. P. Routray) Judge
M.K.Panda/K. Majhi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed on the same grounds as in Gopinath Sahu v. State of Odisha?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gopinath Sahu v. State of OdishaFollowed¶8
AIR 2020 Ori. 150 · Who else cites this
Petitioner
State
S. Muralidhar
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
