Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Subrat Kumar Behura Vs Union of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2021)

Home
Orissa HC
2021
Subrat Kumar Behura Vs Union of IndiaSubrat Kumar Behura v. Union of India

Dismissed

Subrat Kumar Behura v. Union of India

Orissa HC8 Jul 2021WP(C)/7356/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the suggestion of the learned counsel for the petitioner, citing continuing COVID-19 restrictions.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cite this judgement

Subrat Kumar Behura v. Union of India, WP(C)/7356/2021 (OD), decided on 8 July 2021.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Savitri Ratho

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous based on the submission of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive legal principle was elucidated in this short order.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.7356 of 2021

Subrat Kumar Behura

…. Petitioner

Mr. K. Khuntia, Advocate.

-versus-

Union of India & Ors. …. Opp. Parties.

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

08.07.2021

Order No.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

Mr. Khuntia, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous.

In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice

(Savitri Ratho) Judge

Prasant

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Subrat Kumar Behura
respondent
Union of India

Coram

AI extract

Savitri Ratho

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 8 Jul 2021 · July
Registered: 24 Feb 2021
Case no.: WP(C)/7356/2021
CNR: ODHC010144652021
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: S. Muralidhar CJ Miss Savitri Ratho
Disposal: Infructuous

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Muralidhar CJ Miss Savitri Ratho

Managing Director Orissa Forest Development Corporation Ltd. Vs Narayan Mallick
7 Jul 2021
Utkal Motors Pvt.Ltd Vs State
7 Jul 2021
Vino Regalia (India) Pvt.Ltd. Vs State of Orissa
7 Jul 2021
Nirakar Behera Vs State of Odisha
8 Jul 2021
Orissa Stevedores Ltd. Vs Union of India
8 Jul 2021
Sailendra Kumar Patra Vs State of Odisha
8 Jul 2021