The writ petition seeking directions for land diversion was disposed of without issuing further orders, as no further steps were taken by the opposite parties. No further directions were deemed necessary in the present petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C).No.6764 of 2013
Janardan Naik and others …. Petitioners Mr. A.U.Senapati, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others … Opposite Parties Mr.S.P.Sarangi, Advocate for O.P.No.6
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
16.09.2021
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
C.R. Biswal
Janardan Naik and others
State of Odisha and others
B P Routray
S Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
