Watershed Asn.Larka v. Mission Leader
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Petition (C) No.5149 of 2002 heard via video conferencing. Petitioners were unrepresented; the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5149 of 2002
Pancham Majhi and another …. Petitioners None -versus- Mission Leader-cum-Collector, …. Watershed Development Project Opp. Parties None CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER Order No. 02.09.2021 06. 1. This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2. None appears for the Petitioners. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( B.P. Routray) Judge
KC Bisoi
Pancham Majhi and another
Mission Leader-cum-Collector
B. P. ROUTRAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court