SBI v. B.M.,Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner Bank informed the High Court that the loan had been transferred to another entity. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition as having become infructuous, allowing the parties to submit a printout of the order.
What did the court decide?
Impleaded petition disposed of as infructuous due to loan transfer to another entity.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO.4395 OF 2012
SBI, SARB, Madhupatna, Cuttack
…. Petitioner
Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Panda, Advocate
-versus-
B.M., Canara Bank, Chandi Chhak, … Opposite Party
Cuttack
Mr. M.K. Swain(for O.P.No.1), Mr. A.K. Biswal (for O.P. No.2) and Mr. R.K. Rout(for O.P. No.3
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SBI, SARB, Madhupatna, Cuttack
- respondent
B.M., Canara Bank, Chandi Chhak, Cuttack
- respondent
Opposite Party No.2
- respondent
Opposite Party No.3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court