High Court directed the respondent State to consider the petitioner's case for GPF account regularization and pension benefits under OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 in light of earlier judgments within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.31538 OF 2021
Laxmi Mallik
Petitioner
Mr. S.N. Patnaik, Advocate
Vs.
….. State of Odisha & Ors. Opposite parties
Mr. A.K. Sharma, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
07.10.2021
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
1
2
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
A.K. Rana
2 issues framed by the court
Whether GPF account regularization and pension benefits should be granted to petitioner considering his regularization date and prior court orders.
Whether direction should be issued to the respondent authority to provide statutory benefits to the petitioner expeditiously.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Udayanath Rout v. State of OdishaFollowed¶3
Udayanath Rout v. State of Odisha (WPC (OAC) No.2408 of 2015, disposed of on 09.08.2021)
WPC (OAC) No.2408 of 2015Followed¶3
Laxmi Mallik
State of Odisha
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
