The Court allowed the writ petition by analogy to W.P.(C) No. 27401 of 2020. Directions were issued to restore the previous position of the school and provide necessary infrastructure.
The opposite party is directed to restore the school's previous position and provide necessary infrastructure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 312 of 2021
It is agreed by learned counsel for the parties that the issue involved in this case is analogous to one involved in W.P.(C) No. 27401 of 2020 and batch, which have been allowed by this Court vide judgment passed today (04.05.2021).
Therefore, in view of the reasons stated in the detailed judgment dated 04.05.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 27401 of 2020 and batch, this writ petition is allowed.
Since the notification no.5465 dated 11.03.2020 and subsequent office memorandum no. 5538 dated 11.03.2020 as well as corrigendum dated 14.12.2020 have been quashed, the opposite parties are directed to restore back the position of the school in question, as before, and provide necessary infrastructure for smooth running of the same.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s notice no. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
(Dr. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok/Ajaya
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in view of the disposal of analogous matters in W.P.(C) No. 27401 of 2020 and batch.
Alok/Ajaya
Opposite Party (School)
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
