Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Jyotirindra Vs State — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2021)

Home
Orissa HC
2021
Jyotirindra Vs StateJyotirindra v. State

Disposed

Jyotirindra v. State

Orissa HC19 Jul 2021WP(C)/2875/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa disposed of W.P.(C) No. 2875 of 2003 as infructuous at the instance of the petitioner, relying on counsel's submission.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed of as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 2875 of 2003

Sri Jyotirindra Narayan Bhanja Deo

Petitioner

Mr. Santosh Kumar Sethi, Advocate Mrs. Bharati Dash, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa & Others …. Opp. Parties

CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Order No.

ORDER

19.07. 2021

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Sri Jyotirindra Narayan Bhanja Deo
respondent
State of Orissa

Coram

AI extract

S.K. Mishra

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 19 Jul 2021 · July
Registered: 21 Mar 2003
Case no.: WP(C)/2875/2003

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Miss Savitri Ratho S.k.mishra

Pawan Putra Retradin Vs State Bank of India
14 Jul 2021
Shree Sidh Enterpris Vs State and Ors.
14 Jul 2021
Krushna Cement Store Vs B.M.,Union Bank
14 Jul 2021
Orissa Coal Merchant Vs Union of India
19 Jul 2021

Cite this judgement

Jyotirindra v. State, WP(C)/2875/2003 (OD), decided on 19 July 2021.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

S.K. Mishra and Savitri Ratho

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Writ application disposed of as infructuous.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous based on the learned counsel's submission that the matter had become infructuous.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

The matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

Mr. Santosh Kumar Sethi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mrs. Bharati Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of as infructuous.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No. 4587 dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021.

puspa

(S.K. Mishra) Judge ( Savitri Ratho) Judge

Savitri Ratho

CNR

ODHC010000442003

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Miss Savitri Ratho S.k.mishra

Disposal

Withdrawn

Lingaraj Pipes P.Ltd Vs State

19 Jul 2021

Omkar Mission Vs State of Orissa

19 Jul 2021