Writ petitioner, former Sarpanch, sought direction to Collector to dispose of representation regarding disqualification of ward members. Court advised using Section 26 statutory remedy and dismissed the writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed; petitioner advised to approach Collector under Section 26.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24758 of 2021
Soumya Ranjan Pradhan ……. Petitioner
Mr. Sidharth Prasad Das, Adv.
-Versus-
State of Odisha & others ……. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.S. Kanungo, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE C.R. DASH
ORDER
01.09.2021
Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode).
………………………….
(C.R. Dash)
JUDGE
Subha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is directed to dispose of representation in a private matter via writ jurisdiction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Soumya Ranjan Pradhan
State of Odisha
C.R. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
