This writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had crossed the qualifying age of 36 years for O.B.C. candidates, rendering relief impossible.
None. The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the petitioner crossing the qualifying age limit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.24397 of 2014
Punnal Prasad
…. Petitioner Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, Advocate
Mr. Paresh Ku. Sahoo, Advocate for Opposite Party Nos.1 & 2
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE A. K. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(A. K. Mohapatra ) Judge
U.K. Sahoo/Jagabandhu
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding O.B.C. candidates' eligibility age grants relief to a petitioner over the qualifying age.
Whether the writ petition is rendered infructuous due to the petitioner crossing the qualifying age.
Punnal Prasad
Union of India
S. Muralidhar
A. K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
