Dismissed
Susil Ku.Jena v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/21883/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court of Orissa on the ground of subsequent developments at a hearing conducted via video conference on 16.04.2021.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 21883 of 2010
¶2
Sushil Kumar Jena
¶3
…. Petitioner
¶4
M/s. J.K. Mohanty & Associates
¶5
-versus-
¶6
…. State of Odisha and Others Opposite Parties
¶7
Mr. D.K. Mohanty, Additional Government Advocate
¶8
Order No.
¶10
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
16.04.2021
¶11
- This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
¶12
- Mr. D.K. Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State Opposite Parties states that due to subsequent developments, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sushil Kumar Jena
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
AI extract
Chief Justice
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court