High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition as infructuous upon counsel stating the subject matter was no longer subsisting, following principles of cessante ratio.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.19790 of 2012
Sri Jaya Sankar Acharya
…. Petitioner Mr. G.K. Acharya, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. D.K. Mohanty, A.G.A.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
Order No.
ORDER 05.04.2021 1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. As the restrictions due to the COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( B.P. Routray) Judge
C.R. Biswal/ B.K. Barik
Sri Jaya Sankar Acharya
State of Odisha
B. P. Rautray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
