The High Court of Orissa allowed this writ petition by relying on judgments dated 09.09.2021 in connected matters. It directed that a specific list cannot be deemed lapsed by 31.12.2020 and must be implemented under PMR-660.
The list published on 14.12.2020 (modified on 22.12.2020) shall not lapse by 31.12.2020 and shall be implemented in terms of PMR-660.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 1965 of 2021
Rashmiranjan Swain & Others
….
Petitioners
Mr. A. Pati, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Party
Mr. H.M. Dhal, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER_
13.09.2021
Order No.
04
Heard learned counsel for the parties
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
A.K. Rana
( Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the validity of the list published on 14.12.2020 as modified on 22.12.2020 can be held to have lapsed by 31.12.2020.
Whether the PMR-660 is applicable to the petitioners.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) No. 863 of 2021Relied on¶2
W.P.(C) No. 863 of 2021
W.P.(C) No. 1994 of 2021Relied on¶2
W.P.(C) No. 1994 of 2021
W.P.(C) No. 863 of 2021 and W.P.(C) No. 1994 of 2021Referred¶17
W.P.(C) No. 863 of 2021 and W.P.(C) No. 1994 of 2021
Rashmiranjan Swain & Others
State of Odisha & Others
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
