The High Court disposed of a five-year-old PIL (W.P.(C) No.18601 of 2016) where it held that if a cause of action survived, the petitioner could approach the authority via fresh representation and seek appropriate remedies thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18601 of 2016
Ratnakar Pradhan
Petitioner
Mr. Prajit Kumar Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. M.S. Sahoo Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order No.
13.07.2021
Page 1 of 2
certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
S.K. Jena/P.A.
(S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Ratnakar Pradhan
State of Odisha
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
