The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition as infructuous since the subject project had been closed for a long time, with the petitioner appearing via hybrid mode and no other side present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 18327 of 2016
Ajaya Kumar Sahoo ..... Petitioner Mr. D. Mishra, Adv. -VersusPrincipal Secretary to Govt. & ….. Opposite Parties another Mr. S.S. Mohanty, Adv. (O.P. No.2)
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
09.08.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 07. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. Mr. S.S. Mohanty, learned counsel for opposite parties states that the relief sought in this writ petition cannot be granted as the project has been closed since long with the efflux of time. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. (DR. B.R. SARANGI) A.K. Rana JUDGE
Ajaya Kumar Sahoo
Principal Secretary to Govt.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
