Petitioners challenged an impugned order relying on a common judgment in a batch case. The Court disposed of the present writ petition without passing any further order.
The writ petition was disposed of without passing any further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No.1715 of 2021
Pranabandhu Sethi and others
…. Petitioners
M/s. K. C. Sahu and associates, Advocates
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. P. K. Muduli, AGA for State
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
08.07.2021
Order No.
Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others) and batch, no
further order is required to be passed in the present petition.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
M. Panda
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersExplained¶16
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Pranabandhu Sethi and others
State of Odisha and others
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
