The High Court of Orissa disposed of the present writ petition by relying on a common judgment passed in a previous batch petition, ordering no further order as the matter was already sub judice.
The writ petition is disposed of as no further order is required in view of the common judgment in the batch.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No.1699 of 2021
Anusaya Nag
…. Petitioner
M/s. D. Dhar and associates, Advocates
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. P. K. Muduli, AGA for State
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
23.07.2021
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(B.P. Routray)
Judge
M. Panda
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersReferred¶15
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Anusaya Nag
State of Odisha
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
B. P. Routray
Parties & counsel
