The petitioners filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. The Court recorded satisfaction and dismissed the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.16725 of 2018 (Through hybrid mode)
Pranati Pradhan
…. Petitioner
Mr. D.Mohanta, Advocate
-versus-
Mahanadi Coal Field Ltd. and …. Opposite Parties others None CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA ORDER 29.11.2021
None
Order No.
03.
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
RKS
Page 2 of 2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
V.Rajendran v. Annasamy Pandian (D) thr. L.Rs.Referred¶1
V.Rajendran v. Annasamy Pandian (D) thr. L.Rs., (2017) 5 SCC 63 · Who else cites this
Pranati Pradhan
Mahanadi Coal Field Ltd.
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
