Petitioner by video conference. State counsel cited efflux of time rendering writ petition infructuous. Court disposed of the petition on that ground without appearing counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.16094 of 2013
Lakshman Pradhan
…. Petitioner None
-versus-
…. Opposite Parties Smt. S. Patnaik, Additional Government Advocate for State
Collector, Nayagarh and others
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
12.04.2021
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
( B.P. Routray) Judge
M. Panda
Lakshman Pradhan
Collector, Nayagarh
Smt. S. Patnaik
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
