Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Surendra Jena Vs State — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2021)

Home
Orissa HC
2021
Surendra Jena Vs StateSurendra Jena v. State

Dismissed

Surendra Jena v. State

Orissa HC26 Apr 2021WP(C)/15574/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Orissa dismissed W.P.(C) No.15574 of 2008 as infructuous due to passage of time and vacated the interim order if any.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous and interim order vacated.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.15574 of 2008

Surendra Jena …. Petitioner

None

-versus-

…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. D.K. Mohanty, Additional Government Advocate

CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

Order No.

26.04.2021

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Surendra Jena
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

B. P. ROUTRAY

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 26 Apr 2021 · April
Registered: 25 Oct 2008
Case no.: WP(C)/15574/2008

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Muralidhar CJ B. P. Routray

Kishore Chandra Behera Vs Tahasildar,Odapadar
23 Apr 2021
Viresh Hemani Vs Income Tax Officer,W
23 Apr 2021
Tata Refractories Vs Union of Inida
23 Apr 2021
Chandra Mohan Singh Vs State
26 Apr 2021

Cite this judgement

Surendra Jena v. State, WP(C)/15574/2008 (OD), decided on 26 April 2021.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

B. P. ROUTRAY

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous and interim order vacated.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the passage of time. Any interim order, if granted previously, is hereby vacated. No substantive legal question was adjudicated as the matter was disposed of on procedural grounds of obsolescence.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Mr. Mohanty states that due to passage of time, the writ petition

itself has been rendered infructuous.

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

The interim order, if any, stands vacated.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice

( B.P. Routray)

Judge

KC Bisoi

CNR

ODHC010012862008

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

S. Muralidhar CJ B. P. Routray

Disposal

Disposed Off

Vivek Kumar Sahu Vs State of Odisha

26 Apr 2021

Bidyadhar Patro Vs State

26 Apr 2021