This judicial order records the withdrawal of a writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners was given liberty to withdraw, the withdrawal memo was kept on record, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.15444 of 2006
S. Narasingha Murty and others
…. Petitioners
M/s. R. K. Pattnaik & S.K. Jena,Advocate
-versus-
Sri Gopaljee Mahaprabhu and others
…. Opposite Parties
Learned Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
08.09.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
rules.
T.TUDU
Page 2 of 2
S. Narasingha Murty and others
Sri Gopaljee Mahaprabhu and others
S.K. MISHRA
SAVITRI RATHO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
