Counsel for petitioner stated the 2008 writ petition was settled. The Court disposed of the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum if any cause of action survives.
Disposed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 14171 of 2008
Mr. J. Pal, learned counsel for the petitioners states that this matter is of the year 2008 and he has no instruction at the moment, but he has obtained instruction that the matter has been settled between the parties.
Thereby, this Court disposes of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner if any cause of action survives, he may approach the appropriate forum.
As the restrictions due to the COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020.
..…………….…………… (Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J)
Ajaya
2
Ajaya
Respondent
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
