The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the counsel for the Bank submitted that the petitioner's loan account had been settled and no dues were outstanding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 13886 of 2018 Gyanendra Nath Pattnaik ….
…. Petitioner
Mr. Santanu Kumar Sarangi, Advocate
-versus-
B.M., UCO Bank& Anr.
…. Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Swain, Advocate (UCO Bank)
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Order No.
ORDER
03.09.2021
The matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
Mr. S.K. Sarangi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.K. Swain, learned counsel for Bank are present.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for Bank that the loan account of the petitioner has been settled and no further dues are outstanding against the petitioner. Hence, the matter has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
(S.K. Mishra) Judge
( Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Puspa
Gyanendra Nath Pattnaik
B.M., UCO Bank & Anr.
S.K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
