Writ petition filed seeking direction for demarcation of specific land plots. The Court directed the petitioner to approach the Tahasildar and disposed of the petition without granting the prayed relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.12680 OF 2021
Raghunath Nayak
…. Petitioner Mr. Ashok Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
Sub-Collector, Balasore and others
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
09.08.2021
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
already demarcated the case land on 31st January, 2019 by initiating Demarcation Case No.61 of 2018. Thus, the Petitioner does not have any cause of action to file this writ petition.
application.
jm
Page 2 of 2
Raghunath Nayak
Sub-Collector, Balasore and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
