Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition challenging an order under Section 144 Cr.P.C. and applied for settlement of Government land. The Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, allowing the Petitioner to approach the competent authority.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; liberty granted to move competent authority for land settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.12327 OF 2021
Udaya Kumar Singh
…. Petitioner
Mr. Rabindranath Prusty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Dillip Kumar Mishra, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
02.07.2021
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
settlement of the land before the Collector, Jharsuguda is not maintainable. He has to file proper application under the Odisha Government Land Settlement Act, 1962 for settlement of Government land in his favour. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is not maintainable.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
jm
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Udaya Kumar Singh
State of Odisha
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
